Menu
Menu
In a 1-year projection, traditional products produce 512% more carbon and water footprints than Pubinno Technology.
This report provides a comprehensive overview of Pubinno’s sustainability initiatives, with a focus on the carbon and water footprints of its Smart Clean and Smart Tap products. This analysis has been conducted to assess the sustainability performance of Smart Tap and Smart Clean.
The calculations in the report are based on ISO 14064 and ISO 14046 standards. The analysis takes into account the materials used, logistics in the production process, and electricity consumption during product use. It is assumed that the classical cleaning method and the materials used for the tap are entirely made of stainless steel. The logistics aspect is considered the same for both the classical cleaning method and Smart Tap. The emission factors are determined based on data obtained from credible sources.
| Products | Carbon Footprint | Water Footprint |
|---|---|---|
| Classic Beer Tap | 0.834 kgCO2e | 160.27 Liters |
| Smart Tap | 40.22 kgCO2e | 12,199.15 Liters |
| Traditional Draft Beer Cleaning | 20.247 kgCO2e | 4,229.4 Liters |
| Smart Clean | 221.12 kg CO2e | 43,362.2 Liters |
The Smart Tap device will start to use less water than traditional taps after dispensing a total of 588 liters of beer.
Location C
4 Smart Tap and 1 Smart Clean
Consumed Beer in Weekly are 2349 liters
After 27 days of operation
The Smart Tap exhibits a comparative advantage over the Classic Beer Tap in terms of carbon footprint.
After 32 days of operation
The Smart Tap exhibits a comparative advantage over the Classic Beer Tap in terms of water footprint.
The analyses were conducted under the assumption of employing Pubinno Technologies instead of traditional products, within the same location and environmental conditions.
Using bottles for the same amount of beer logistics results in more than twice the carbon emissions compared to kegs.
Considering the energy consumption of these devices, the use of refrigeration systems generates emissions at least three times higher than that of the keg cooling system.
Bottled beer consumption leads to a carbon footprint approximately 150% higher than that of keg beer consumption
When comparing keg beer consumption, the carbon emissions from the classic beer tap begin to surpass those from the Smart Tap after approximately 493 liters of beer have been consumed.
After 14 days of operation
The Pubinno Technologies exhibits a comparative
advantage over the Classic Products in terms of carbon footprint.
After 15 days of operation
The Pubinno Technologies exhibits a comparative advantage over the Classic Products in terms of water footprint.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
